Posts Tagged ‘Internal Communications’

Why you should beta test your communications

Tuesday, January 17th, 2012

 

When companies have a new product, they often spend a lot of time testing those products before they roll them out, especially when it comes to software and websites providing a service. They want to make sure everything functions properly and the end-user experience is the best possible one. So why not take the same approach with your communications – before you send them out?

You likely have some kind of review process for the materials you create. Your boss, your boss’ boss, your internal client, legal. What about your “end-user”? Whether you’re communicating a new company program or marketing a new product, someone from your target audience can provide invaluable feedback before they see the final email or the shiny new brochure along with everyone else. If you work in retail, for example, that target audience person can be a store manager, district manager or front-line associate. If you work in health care, that target audience reviewer can be a doctor, nurse, HR administrator or patient. If you are working on a marketing brochure, reach out to your network and find someone you know that fits the customer profile.

Giving your target audience a sneak peak of the product and how you plan to market and communicate it can save you a lot of time, energy and money. Because he or she is not as close to the project as you are, your target audience tester will think of questions you might not have thought about. He or she will hopefully be up front and let you know if something is unclear or sounds too salesy and not authentic enough.

Does your review process allow for testing your communications with target audience members? What works for you?

Share

Target and Breastfeeding: How to Communicate a PR Problem Internally

Sunday, January 8th, 2012

Let’s take a look at The Flip Side of our last blog post about how to turn a PR problem into a positive using Target’s example about breastfeeding. Because we’re not employees, we don’t know how Target communicated internally about the string of events and how they advised their employees on how to handle customer complaints and questions in stores. We can, however, use it as an example about how companies can stick to some guiding principles to proactively communicate with their employees when a PR issue or crisis arises.

Be timely:  Get the word out to your employees quickly. Don’t wait for the storm to get worse or blow over. Your employees should hear about important events affecting them and their company from an internal source rather than an external one. Well-informed associates can serve as informal ambassadors of the company. Proactive communications with your employees helps them better communicate with customers who might ask them questions. Tactics can include:

  • Check in with your cross-functional team of go-to people from HR, Operations, Legal, Marketing, Social Media and of course any leaders who need to know. Keep them in the loop of your communications plan of action and get their input on communications. Don’t forget external communications folks if they are in a separate department. They should be integral partners. Internal and external communications should be aligned.
  • Let your employees know about the situation through your regular channels as soon as possible. Keep them in the loop on an ongoing basis. Even if you don’t have all the facts, communicate this is what we know now. We’ll keep you updated when we know more.
  • Create a central source of information on your intranet. Don’t bury information so employees have to search to find it. All communications should be visible here and should point employees to this central location for all the info they need. Post a link to important documents like the company policy involved to reinforce the correct actions.

 

Be open and honest. Let your employees know what happened. Don’t leave out details you think your employees can’t handle. Transparency builds credibility. Be forthright. Let them know if the company screwed up. Tell them what should have been done and what will be done to handle the situation. Tactics can include:

  • Make your top execs visible. Think about a thoughtful and sincere CEO blog or video addressing the situation with employees.
  • Arm managers with tools such as talking points to inform and discuss the issue, explain how the company is handling it, reinforce the company’s policy and where to get additional information.
  • Create talking points for frontline employees who speak with customers in person or on the phone. How should they handle customer questions or complaints? Keep the message consistent and clear companywide.

 

Two-way:  Keep the lines of communication open. In the face of a serious issue or crisis, employees will have questions and concerns. You need their feedback to know how to communicate differently or better. Tactics can include:

  • Create a central point of contact to field questions and concerns. Depending on the PR issue, you might want to create a special internal email box or hotline.
  • Ask managers to forward any questions they are getting from their teams.
  • If your intranet platform lets employees post comments, use them to gauge how well you’re communicating.
  • Refresh your communications if you see a pattern of questions or comments.

 

Sometimes PR problems bring out the best in a company. As mentioned in our previous blog, they can help establish your company as an industry leader and give your employees a chance to shine under pressure. If you hear about an extraordinary example of how an employee handled a situation related to the issue, share the story with the rest of the company. It shows appreciation, boosts morale and lets employees know they can make a difference even during difficult moments.

Share

Try Serving Up McDonald’s On Social Media

Sunday, September 18th, 2011

I read on Twitter about a poll related to what Americans think about President Obama’s jobs plan. I follow current events closely, but I couldn’t properly weigh all the pros and cons of the plan. I understand (I think) the big ideas behind the plan, but how do you decipher the plan’s details when they float in a fog of partisan spin and interpretations that wildly differ?

So I wondered how accurate this poll could be. Many people can’t name their own members of Congress. How could they accurately answer a pollster’s questions about the jobs plan unless they simply rooted for their favorite political team or flew with the latest spin they heard on talk radio?

I decided to spark a Twitter conversation. I Tweeted “Do you think most of the public understands the President’s jobs plan well enough to answer questions about it for a poll?” I got zero replies. My next Tweet was “Do you think the media loves polls too much?” I again got zero replies.

I then got hungry and pulled into the drive-thru of the closest McDonald’s. Personally, my stomach feels blah after cheeseburgers, but McDonald’s is on to something by being quick and easy. I parked under a shady tree to enjoy lunch and wondered how often people pick McDonald’s when in a hurry. I Tweeted “How often do you eat at McDonald’s?” This time I got two replies.

While on cheeseburger number two, my mind wandered further and I began to think about an upcoming birthday. I tweeted “What is a romantic, inexpensive birthday gift for a woman?” After some back and forth, this led to 10 replies. My Tweets about the President’s jobs plan and the media got no one to join the conversation. But questions about McDonald’s and birthdays got people typing.

This doesn’t surprise me. When I worked at Fox10, posting links to my stories rarely generated much discussion. But the opposite was true when I whined about a co-worker. I notice when I’m on Twitter, the journalists I follow are often discussing the big event of the evening. But the public often doesn’t re-Tweet this information or, for example, reveal their personal opinions on Social Security or whether the latest election is a reflection on Obama. Most people are discussing what’s on TV or where they ate dinner.

A friend of mine declares this means social media is not a platform for having big discussions about big ideas. I think that’s an over generalization, but I understand how people such as my mother would consider this proof of a society which further detests life’s intellectual things … such as reading. On the other hand, I personally have two examples of when my frivolous questions later sparked outside conversations about conducting possible business. This is similar to two men BSing on the golf course and later collaborating on a project never discussed during 18 holes.

The hope is if you’re not always talking work and are willing to discuss life’s everyday events, you make that personal connection which one day may bring you business. Yes, your social media streams should include at least some relevant content on your industry to at least build the foundation of leadership in your field. But with Twitter often feeling like a flea market of overwhelming content thrown at you from every direction, serving up some questions about McDonald’s is a welcomed relief to those of us who wish to escape or take a mental break. And just like fast food, those apparently non-sensical Tweets may lead to some quick and easy business.

What subjects do you get the most feedback on when using social media?

Subscribe via email to our blog, join us on Facebook & follow us on Twitter.

Share

Should Your Social Media Get Nasty?

Thursday, September 15th, 2011

Via Twitter, a former TV newsman sent me a link, asking if I had seen it. The link showed a TV reporter at a door asking for comment for a story. The man’s answer on the other side of the door included an F bomb. That was only the beginning.

The man left the building and confronted the TV crew. The F bombs continued to flow along with other words that turned this into an episode better suited for HBO. He placed his hand up to cover the camera’s lens. And he threatened to make the experience more than a verbal lashing. Someone behind the camera said he assumed this man wasn’t from public relations.

I’m a big advocate of compelling video. I also believe in making a name for yourself by providing interesting content. The video provided raw emotion and an example of one of the worst ways of handling the media. Should I post a link to the video on my social media accounts?

Bad words don’t usually offend me unless they are directed toward me in anger. People curse in public (which I’m against). Others I just met often aren’t afraid to get foul even though we don’t know each other well. And social media is full of people who don’t seem to care their bad words are forever in writing.

Post the link would be the edgy thing to do. It would be taking a risk. People might retweet it over and over, leading to more eyes on my services. I could post the link with a warning.

On the other hand, people who might not be as outspoken appreciate an effort to keep our language clean. The video might turn away as many as it might intrigue. And would the video serve as a first impression for those just getting to know me?

In the end, my answer boiled down to branding. Posting the video might offer some pluses, but my brand is not linking myself to content that requires 20,000 bleeps. In the future, I can still achieve edginess and take risks without my content blurting out every nasty word known to man and woman. In fact, I often find clever content more impressive than social media that tries too hard to shock.

Businesses should always consider their brand when choosing content. The case might not involve cursing. It might simply be a matter of quality. For example, if you’re a prestigious doctor with a sleek office and reputation, should the video describing your services appear to be shot by your uncle? Do you really want to comment on that certain political debate? If your brand is sophisticated, is cheesy humor just going to be a joke on you?

If Apple equals innovation and Volvo equals safety, what is your brand all about? And how best to represent that brand? I decided not to represent The Flip Side with some fouled-mouth guy flipping people off.

What would you have done with the video? What similar situations have you faced in your industry?

Subscribe via email to our blog, join us on Facebook & follow us on Twitter.

Share

New Video: Staying Focused When Selling Online

Wednesday, September 14th, 2011

If you subscribe to our blog and can’t see the video in your email, please click on the title.

Share

Internal Communications: Are You Cheating On Your Logo?

Tuesday, September 13th, 2011

It happened on a day like any other. I was at my last corporate job reading emails when I received a meeting invite to help with a project. But this wasn’t just any project. It had a name and a logo that was not the company logo. It might as well have been a project more suited to NASA. It had a space theme and a clip art logo. Ugh. A communicator’s pet peeve.  Uh, Houston – we’ve got an identity problem. There was a growing trend in the company of rogue logos and strange project names with lots of acronyms that had nothing to do with our company. A sort of logo and acronym soup was simmering.

One department in particular was so proud of its logo, I knew it was going to be incredibly resistant to let go of it. Armed with the creative director, I met with the department head whose jaw dropped when he heard that his logo was “childish” looking. I was secretly elated to hear this. But the light bulb seemed to go off when the creative director explained how his wayward logo was competing with the company logo.

Sure it’s great that project team members are excited about their work and want to gain visibility for it. But what’s a communicator or marketer to do when faced with a sea of project names and logos in direct competition with the corporate identity? The way I see it, the company logo reigns supreme. There is no need for lots of other logos. They dilute the brand. From the outside looking in, multiple logos and project names can appear to be like independent companies all shouting to get noticed.

Here are some ideas to help cast your brand protector net over those project names and logos gone wild:

  • Start communicating about brand identity and graphic standards early. Orientation is a great place to start.
  • Create a graphics standards policy that can be easily found. Post it on your intranet.
  • Think visually. Educate employees about your brand identity through examples they can see. Video is a powerful way to do this.
  • Send out periodic reminders through your communications channels.
  • Compromise. Yes – there are little things that can be done. Instead of creating a logo, how about a typeface using the company’s brand font of choice?
  • Arm managers with talking points so they can be prepared to answer questions and address situations sooner rather than later.

What’s your opinion of multiple logos and project names? How do you address them in your company?

 

Subscribe via email to our blog, join us on Facebook & follow us on Twitter.

Share

With Video, Don’t Forget To Think Small

Monday, September 12th, 2011

I click on my favorite football team’s smart phone app. The screen offers nine options for me to click on. Information scrolls on the bottom of the screen as if this is CNN. I tap on video. The gear spins. Sometimes the video plays. Sometimes the video does not play and the app bounces me back to the previous screen no matter how many times I try.

Once upon a time, companies which made their content mobile friendly were ahead of the curve. Now those which don’t are behind. The web is flowing with information on the ever growing significance of mobile devices. Some of us refer to our tablets and smart phones even when sitting before a workhorse desktop.

Yet some organizations still view their mobile versions as footnotes. Sometimes the mobile content isn’t as exhaustive as the full version. And sometimes the mobile content doesn’t even work.

You can’t afford to make mobile technology an afterthought. If a TV news station offers me a stripped-down view of their content on my phone, I’ll turn the mobile channel. And if the video won’t play, I’ll only keep trying to tap for so long.

This applies even to websites without a mobile sibling. Smart phones will allow me to view your full website on my phone even if I’m required to squint to read the small font. If, for example, your video format only works on a desktop not attached to my hip, then you’re not thinking outside the computer screen box.

Sometimes thinking big is ensuring you’re also thinking small.

Subscribe via email to our blog, join us on Facebook & follow us on Twitter.

Share

Media Relations: Why you shouldn’t dump the local news

Sunday, September 11th, 2011

Local stations include pockets of people still trying hard to deliver an intellectual look at issues that matter most.

On a regular basis, my friend and TV reporter Steve Krafft could make the morning news meeting laugh. When producers finished reading off the dreadful events from overnight that we might deem newsworthy, someone would ask for more story ideas. Almost with giddiness and a sarcastic smile, I anticipated a pause and then the moment Steve began his first few words.

Local news often skews toward crime and weather stories. Most managers won’t acknowledge this, but it is what it is. This is the chief complaint from viewers who abandoned local news years ago. But Steve never abandoned his passion for trying to inject the 5pm newscast with a jolt of politics. At that conference table in the morning news meeting, he might as well have been an ambassador for CSPAN or The New York Times.

So when Steve’s morning monologues began, the snickering often followed. I don’t think co-workers were laughing at him. They were laughing at the conventional wisdom that some of the world’s most important and intellectual issues often fall on deaf ears in our local newsrooms. Someone once told Steve one of his ideas was good but better suited for A20 of The New York Times.

Despite the obstacles, Steve always keeps plugging away at politics. This week, his persistence paid off by securing nearly a 10-minute, one-on-one interview with White House Press Secretary Jay Carney. If you’re addicted to cable news, you may hear the press secretary on a regular basis and wonder why this type of interview impresses me. Well, this just in: A press secretary for the President of The United States just doesn’t give a local TV reporter 10 minutes of time, especially not one-on-one. This was not one of those stories a reporter turned in two hours without many phone calls and good ‘ole fashion, behind-the-scenes hard work.

Also, give credit where credit is due. The same managers we might wish to heckle for making the local news mundane often encourage reporters like Steve to think big. Someone behind-the-scenes sweats hard to ensure an interview between a Phoenix TV station and the White House press secretary airs smoothly both logistically and technically. And a series of show producers ultimately ensure the story airs.

I, as well as anyone, understand how the local news evokes its share of stereotypes that can make it resemble a Saturday Night Live skit. And sometimes the local news reminds me of a stubborn old man in how it insists on sticking with certain formats and coverage. And TV reporters such as Steve don’t always succeed. The day after he interviews a presidential press secretary, you might see him in front of a house fire in a neighborhood you couldn’t find on a map. But his passion and persistence have won him top-notch interviews and trips to cover presidential debates and campaigns. The New York Times once even quoted him. His efforts might also win him a few laughs, but he’s OK with that. As he would say, you’ve got to fight the fight. And when he wins, viewers win.

You can see Steve’s interview with White House Press Secretary Jay Carney here.

What are your thoughts about today’s local news? Please share them with me and leave a comment.

Share

Video: The dog who loves belly flops

Tuesday, August 23rd, 2011

Share

Video: It’s too easy being green

Monday, August 15th, 2011

It’s a cardinal sin but I still see it all the time:  photographers shooting interviews of someone against a white wall. The white wall sometimes is built of bricks, which adds the sophisticated texture of a street alley. Others shoot against a green wall, technically known as a green screen. The weather forecaster lives against the green screen. He’s looking at a green wall behind him, not a wall of expensive, consultant-approved graphics, maps and numbers.

Some companies will produce a video for your business by placing you against a green screen. It’s pretty easy. Just stand in front of the green screen, talk for a minute or two about your company and watch your logo or other video magically appear behind you when you receive the final product. This approach also might save you some green.

You would never promote your business as a cookie cutter company. You stand out from the competition. You find ways to set yourself apart. Why play the role of weatherman and stand in front of a green screen like 30 other businesses did before you?

Green screens serve their purposes, but telling a business’ story is not one of them. Shoot your video at your business. Find an interesting background. Get visual. Show your place in action. What happens behind the scenes? Who are the characters who make your company click?

If your job is standing around in one spot all day with nothing more than a PowerPoint presentation, maybe you can justify green lighting a green screen video. But I bet even that type of boss has something more interesting to show potential customers.

A green screen can make your brand feel blue.

Share